How to counteract the FPV

Last time I introduced the FPV in the Russian-Ukrainian war, not only fast, at the same time flying altitude is very low, Russia and Ukraine are making full use of the FPV to attack each other, and the effect of small and big is obvious, but also let the other side can not be defended.

There are spears and shields, both sides in the massive use of FPV at the same time, but also trying to prevent each other’s FPV attacks. In addition to traditional anti-drone tactics, the Russian military has begun to make extensive use of electronic signal jammers, which can interfere with the GPS and radio communications of drones, thereby disrupting the remote control signals of the traversing aircraft.

A report released in May by the Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies, a British think tank, estimated that the U.S. military loses an average of 10,000 drones per month, with small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), such as FPVs, accounting for the majority of the losses. Many of the Russian army’s heavy equipment, such as tanks and armoured vehicles, are now wearing ‘iron mesh covers’ to prevent them from being exploited by FPVs. Online photos also show that the Russian army in the Bakhmut near the road on both sides of the street lamp poles between the camouflage nets to prevent Ukrainian FPV attacks on the road vehicles, which suggests that the interception of crossing the aircraft should be used fishing line rather than net, because the fishing line is thinner, FPV cameras are difficult to detect, the drone operator is more difficult to avoid, as the conflict continues, the next this kind of As the conflict continues, this game of ‘cat and mouse’ will continue.

Some years ago, Kikundi cha SOBO started to do in-depth research on FPV countermeasures, combined with the characteristics of FPV, developed special countermeasures PFV equipment, which can provide early warning, quick response and countermeasures, after a large number of tests and practice to get a very good!